MR Miscellaneous BCGJ
Answer 21 June 1869.
684
5851
323
bo bo trong trong tiếng
My Lord,
MAY 27 1869
Fields.
London: W.C.
24 May 1869
In the matter of an appeal from H. M. Attorney General at Hong Kong-
Regina v. Saint
We have been instructed to act on behalf of M. Paint the Respondent in this case, which is expected to be brought before the P. C. on appeal from the decision of the C. J. of the Supreme Court at Hong Kong.
The matter in question formed one of three alleged ex officio informations filed by Her Majesty's Acting Attorney General for the colony of Hong Kong against the Defendant for libel on the Governor of the Portuguese colony of Macao. When the case came on for argument on demurrer, judgment was given in favor of the Defendant.
The Attorney General at Hong Kong then applied for leave to appeal to the Privy Council. This application was refused on the ground that the Court had no power...
M
R
Miscellan
B
C
G
J
Answa 21 June 1869.
684
5851
323
bo bo trong trong tiếng
My Lord /
MAY. 27 1869
Fields.
an London: W.C.
24 May 1869
In the tatter of an appeal from H. M. Attorney General at Hong Kong-
Regina Saint
We have been instructed to act on
behalf of
M. Paint the Respondent in this case the Respondent in this case which is expected to be
brought before the P. C.
on
appeal from the
decision of the C. J. of the supreme Court
at Hong Hong.
The matter in question formed
one
our
of three
alleged
ex officia informations filed by Her Majesty's acting Attorney General for the colony of blong Rong against the Defendant for libel on the Governor of the Portuguese colony of Mação. When the case argument judgment was given
in favor of the Defendant.
came
072-
for
on demurrer.
"The Attorney General at Hong Kong then applied for leave to appeal to the "Privy Council - This application was refused
the ground that the bourt had no power
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.